On TV.com: ANGELINA JOLIE looks stunning as usual
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Matt Hines, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Dec 5, 2003 4:42:00 PM

SCO Group Chief Executive Darl McBride is invoking the Founding Fathers in his company's battle over Unix intellectual property rights.

In an open letter posted on the SCO Web site Thursday, McBride argues that the General Public License (GPL) that underlies distribution of Linux, a Unix-derived operating system, is unconstitutional because it violates copyright and patent laws established by Congress. He also sharply criticizes two of SCO's most aggressive adversaries who, he says, do not believe in federally mandated copyright protection.

"In the past 20 years, the Free Software Foundation and others in the open source software movement have set out to actively and intentionally undermine the U.S. and European systems of copyrights and patents," McBride wrote. "Red Hat's position is that current U.S. intellectual property law 'impedes innovation in software development' and that 'software patents are inconsistent with open source/free software."


Get Up to Speed on...
Open source
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.


The Free Software Foundation is an open-source industry group, and Red Hat is one of the primary distributors of Linux.

Separately on Friday, SCO said it had postponed its quarterly earnings report but would stand by its earlier revenue forecast.

The Lindon, Utah-based company attributed the delay to the need for more time to account for a $50 million investment. SCO had planned to report results for its fiscal fourth quarter, ended Oct. 31, on Friday, which already was a slip from an earlier schedule. SCO has now moved the earnings release to Dec. 22, but said the transaction would not affect its revenue or cash holdings.

The company reiterated its previously stated fourth-quarter sales projections of $22 million to $25 million.

SCO owns several key copyrights related to the Unix operating system and has been aggressively defending its intellectual property holdings connected to the software, including filing a $3 billion lawsuit against IBM earlier this year. IBM later responded with a related countersuit against SCO.

In the letter, McBride said that the ongoing controversies related to its claims regarding Linux "will rage for at least another 18 months, until our original case (against IBM) comes to trial."

The GPL, which serves as the legal foundation for Linux, was created in the 1980s by Richard Stallman to govern the Gnu's Not Unix (GNU) software project to clone Unix. The license permits anyone to see, modify and distribute a program's underlying source code, as long as the author of the modifications publishes them when distributing the modified version.

McBride contended in the letter that copyright and patent laws adopted by the U.S. Congress and the European Union are critical to the "further growth and development of the $186 billion global software industry, and to the technology business in general." He also said that the controversial Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which is aimed at protecting intellectual property rights, helps validate SCO's Linux claims.

"It is paramount that the DMCA be given full force and effect, as envisioned by Congress," McBride wrote. "However, there is a group of software developers in the United States, and other parts of the world, that do not believe in the approach to copyright protection mandated by Congress."

SCO recently vowed to widen its legal battle against the open-source community, saying it intends to sue large-scale Linux users for copyright infringement. The company signed an agreement with the law firm of David Boies, who is already handling its case against IBM, to include other Linux-related copyright cases. SCO plans to begin filing suits within the next few months, targeting large companies that have significant Linux installations.

Lawsuits targeting Linux users are expected to be filed within roughly the next 90 days, with initial suits targeting 1,500 companies that have significant Linux systems.

CNET News.com's David Becker and Mike Ricciuti contributed to this report.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 122 Talkback(s)
oh give me a break...
most politicians are liars... party has no affect on their lack of honesty...

as for the gore thing, what were his exact words? the tv coverage i remmeber was soemthing to the effect of he sai... (Read the rest)
Posted by: ryusen Posted on: 12/09/03 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Wow. Just...wow. Damon K   | 12/05/03
You admire ignorance? voska   | 12/05/03
Obvious to 'WHO'? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/05/03
Obvious Yagotta B. Kidding   | 12/05/03
Before we get carried away... IT_User   | 12/05/03
Who's kidding who Don? bgoss@...   | 12/06/03
Umm You do realize.. vdraken   | 12/05/03
Is it ignorance? John L. Ries   | 12/06/03
Heh.... John E Wahd   | 12/05/03
ROFL Not average Joe   | 12/05/03
i'll give you that much ryusen   | 12/05/03
Wrong party Rick_K   | 12/05/03
He had the right party - Quit listening to republican stories bgoss@...   | 12/06/03
Physician heal thyself! Spoon Jabber   | 12/08/03
oh give me a break... ryusen   | 12/09/03
party reasoning ryusen   | 12/08/03
Hmm Suicida|   | 12/05/03
True in one respect. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/05/03
Or Richard Stallman... Delaware Boy   | 12/05/03
Stallman voska   | 12/05/03
how so? stephen732@...   | 12/05/03
Here you go voska   | 12/08/03
Even if you are correct.... Laff   | 12/05/03
Do you really think Delaware Boy   | 12/05/03
They have no choice.. Patrick Jones   | 12/05/03
So, how many dscherf   | 12/05/03
Did you know... MalumRegnat   | 12/05/03
But how many buggies? :) (NT) dscherf   | 12/05/03
Well then if they can not adapt or compete... Laff   | 12/05/03
mmmm....Walmart (insert Homer-esque gurgling drool sound here). Jack-Booted EULA   | 12/05/03
The Problem I have with Walmart voska   | 12/08/03
And maintain it's profit margin? Michael Kelly   | 12/05/03
Re: Do you really think rpmyers1   | 12/05/03
Adapting is simple voska   | 12/08/03
Software patents and copyright need to change voska   | 12/05/03
Yes, no, and maybe... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/05/03
corolation, not evidence ryusen   | 12/05/03
In a general way I agree a little. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/05/03
to be honest, ryusen   | 12/05/03
Shouldn't be able to... IT_User   | 12/06/03
Stupid NO MORE REPLIES rule! (was Re: Shouldn't be able to... ) none none   | 12/06/03
Stupid NO PREVIEW rule none none   | 12/06/03
My error. One more time! none none   | 12/06/03
ok again none none   | 12/06/03
I've seen many innovations held back voska   | 12/08/03
Can't argue with that? NemesisNL   | 12/06/03
Nothing Illegal about the GPL... Root User   | 12/05/03
Excellent counterpoint! No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/05/03
Thanks, No_Ax... Root User   | 12/05/03
I tend to agree with you, but... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/05/03
Re: Thanks, No_Ax... none none   | 12/05/03
Not SCO vs IBM IT_User   | 12/06/03
if SCO has a point... NemesisNL   | 12/06/03
Court Challenge Root User   | 12/06/03
Tested in court Yagotta B. Kidding   | 12/05/03
That is certainly one point of view. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/05/03
Tell you what, Don Yagotta B. Kidding   | 12/05/03
Cyber, what are you talking about? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/05/03
Copyright infringement Yagotta B. Kidding   | 12/05/03
"needs to go to court"? Fred Fredrickson   | 12/08/03
GPL seems like common sense voska   | 12/08/03
Court??? What Court? bgoss@...   | 12/06/03
I can help with that IT_User   | 12/06/03
(NT) Thank you IT bgoss@...   | 12/06/03
Exactly on Point JimSatterfieldW   | 12/05/03
Precisely doctormoriarty   | 12/05/03
Good stuff. Yen_z   | 12/05/03
McBride's rant already debunked by Lessig Sleveless   | 12/05/03
It's not unconstitutional, it's uncapitalist. Delaware Boy   | 12/05/03
Yes,.. Patrick Jones   | 12/05/03
but... dg mh   | 12/05/03
Maybe.. Patrick Jones   | 12/05/03
maybe you have to write software to understand voska   | 12/08/03
They cant stop it Suicida|   | 12/05/03
Isn't that a fundamental inconsistency? WhoIsDaMan   | 12/05/03
Microsoft didn't think it was wong... MalumRegnat   | 12/05/03
Exactly Arrg   | 12/05/03
'tis the season of giving Lunpa   | 12/05/03
One problem voska   | 12/08/03
hehehe Lunpa   | 12/05/03
In one stroke of the pen... Cardinal_Bill   | 12/05/03
ironic Lunpa   | 12/05/03
Don't confuse OSS and GPL BFD   | 12/05/03
The fundumental flaw dscherf   | 12/05/03
intresting Lunpa   | 12/05/03
Thanks dscherf   | 12/05/03
perhaps they might step in ryusen   | 12/05/03
good point Lunpa   | 12/05/03
good point Lunpa   | 12/05/03
Is this just PR? dg mh   | 12/05/03
Even if it was found to be unconstitutional, Arrg   | 12/05/03
This just in Yagotta B. Kidding   | 12/05/03
groklaw rgriffith64@...   | 12/05/03
Cannot be unconstitutional... vinyl1   | 12/05/03
Exactly KeithRisler   | 12/05/03
Nonsense... copy rights are broadly definable KeithRisler   | 12/05/03
Lessig and Moglen's responses David Mohring   | 12/05/03
I can't EVEN believe this guy... BitTwiddler   | 12/05/03
Linux is not about free software. Morris_z   | 12/05/03
This is my brother Darl and this is my other brother Darl Darl'y   | 12/05/03
sign of desparation gsbtech   | 12/05/03
a page out of the RIAA playbook... seriously   | 12/05/03
Yes Mr. McBride: Sue the OSS Infidels! :-) P. Douglas   | 12/05/03
The unintended consequence dscherf   | 12/05/03
Breaking News from Groklaw: IBM Wins Both Motions to Compel davescafe   | 12/05/03
Yea Arrg   | 12/05/03
Unconstitutional? bhanes@...   | 12/05/03
SCO v. GPL Update victim   | 12/05/03
Unconstitutional, huh? John L. Ries   | 12/05/03
Doesn't IBM control the question? IT_User   | 12/05/03
Re: Unconstitutional, huh? John L. Ries   | 12/06/03
Judge has a conflict of interest! IT_User   | 12/05/03
McBride turns constitution on its ear! IT_User   | 12/05/03
McBride's Outstanding Legal Scholarship RobertoSalazar   | 12/05/03
Must be why he always seems to lose! George Mitchell   | 12/06/03
Don't see a problem with this now Mark Miller   | 12/06/03
Is SCO a M$ puppet?? xunil skcor   | 12/08/03
I was wondering the same thing... BitTwiddler   | 12/08/03
Is there anyone who still doesn't think... BitTwiddler   | 12/08/03
MS to open licensing divsion nite_w0lf   | 12/08/03
gee JWatson77   | 12/08/03
Beware of Congress and the courts. xode@...   | 12/08/03

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
Click Here