On CBSSports.com: Today?s Maxim Spin Girl
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By John Borland
Posted on ZDNet News: Jul 14, 2004 6:37:00 PM

A group of high-profile technology companies and movie studios have joined forces to create a new copy protection standard for DVDs that could allow high-definition movies to be copied and used inside home networks.

News.context

What's new:
Several high-profile technology companies and movie studios have formed a coalition to create new high-definition DVD copy protection.

Bottom line:
If the group is successful, a consumer might be able to buy a high-definition movie, store it on a PC, watch it on a networked television and transfer it to a mobile device to watch while traveling. But the two main camps have sharply divided loyalties and may not be able to reach a consensus.

More stories on this topic

Dubbed Advanced Access Content System, or AACS, the technology--which has yet to be created--would replace the anticopying technology that now protects ordinary DVDs, but it would be focused on next-generation, high-definition discs. As previously reported, the group behind the technology includes IBM, Intel, Warner Bros., Disney, Microsoft, Sony and Panasonic, as well as Toshiba.

Unlike today's technology, which allows movies to be played only in authorized DVD players, AACS would potentially allow people to store copies of a movie on home computers and watch it on other devices connected to a network--or even transfer it to a portable movie player.

"We're going to enable a bunch of new scenarios that add to things that you can do with discs in the home today," Michael Ripley, a senior staff engineer at Intel, said during a conference call. "We're building the foundation of something that will have broad support and will meet the broad needs of the affected industries in a way that has not necessarily happened in the past."

The AACS LA alliance (the LA stands for Licensing Authority) marks the culmination of years of tentative and often suspicious contact between the high-tech industry and Hollywood. Technology companies and content companies have developed content protection systems before--but rarely in concert.

The group has considerable work ahead before coming to market. Members said they have already begun working on the specifications and hope to release the technology this year. But earlier cross-industry content protection alliances, such as the Secure Digital Music Initiative, have broken down after hammering out initially promising agreements.

Nevertheless, analysts said the broad range of representation gave the alliance a more promising future than some of the initiatives that had come solely out of the technology industry.

"In this case, you've got two major gorillas from the home video business," GartnerG2 Vice President James Brancheau said. "That's really good news. I like the composition of this."

The content protection system on today's DVDs, called Content Scrambling System, or CSS, was broken in the late 1990s by hackers. A program that helped copy DVDs called DeCSS was subsequently distributed by Norwegian programmer Jon Johansen. Although U.S. courts ruled that it was illegal, other programs soon appeared, including the popular DVD X-Copy from 321 Studios.

Like CSS, the new AACS technology would be added to a disc as it is created and would require specific hardware or software to have the "key" to unlock the content on the disc. Individual keys could be retired by studios if they slip into the public domain, allowing the overall system to continue functioning, even if a key is broken or accidentally released, as was the case with CSS.

Unlike today's technology, the newly developed content protection system would also allow movie studios to specify exactly what could be done with the video. For example, a studio might allow people to store the content on a Media Center PC and stream it to TVs around the house, or to transfer it to a portable device, for example.

Members of the group said the new technology would be complementary to other digital rights management and content protection systems, such as Microsoft's Windows Media.

However, Microsoft has also touted the use of its own digital rights management technology to protect high-definition movie content. The company even took the uncharacteristic step of submitting its Windows Media video technology, called VC-9, to the DVD Forum to be approved as a standard, ultimately hoping that studios would use the video technology and the associated rights management tools to protect new DVDs.

The AACS LA coalition said it would have technology specifications and licenses ready later this year. It will provide licenses to all content, technology or consumers electronics companies.

All of the technology companies involved have separately made their own strides toward elements of content protection that could help create the vision of the "digital home" talked up by so many high-tech executives.

Studios have put some movies online that are protected by Microsoft's digital rights management, accessible through services such as Movielink and CinemaNow. Microsoft and Disney also struck a wide-ranging deal earlier this year that focused on content protection.

IBM has been working on its own home networking security system, called extensible content protection, or xCP, which it says will contribute to the new AACS specifications. Intel, working through the "5C" consortium of Hitachi, Intel, Matsushita, Sony and Toshiba, has helped develop a technology called Digital Transmission Content Protection, designed to protect, compress and move video between different points in a home network.

Both Warner and Sony have previously endorsed that technology.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 113 Talkback(s)
Right, and MY choice is
to find some smuck willing to give me a copy. (Read the rest)
Posted by: middle of nowhere Posted on: 07/15/04 You are currently: Logged In as: a Guest  | Login | Terms of Use
Generalize In All The Wrong Places  ParadigmOdyssey | 07/14/04
I determine what to do with my content.. period.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 07/14/04
Sorry, it's NOT you content.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
First Sale Doctrine  Yagotta B. Kidding | 07/14/04
Yeah, that's why the laws keeping getting tougher.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
What laws?  tic swayback | 07/14/04
I am cerain you are right, nothing is happening to your fair use rights.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
You are a bit confused here  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Whatever, you are still losing them.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Prove it  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Hey, it's you whining about your fair use rights. Not me.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
If something does happen  TechDiva_z | 07/14/04
Two different issues, No Ax  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Really, I thought both issues determine what you can do.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Issue of ownership  tic swayback | 07/14/04
He never said anything about copying it online  Jeff Spicoli | 07/14/04
NWOR  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Actually, it is.  Letophoro | 07/14/04
Limited ownership is correct.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
yes but the content creator has no say in it either  voska | 07/14/04
Gee, isn't that what the article said?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Yup, just thought you didn't know that  voska | 07/14/04
That wasn't your argument  Letophoro | 07/14/04
They can do whatever they want.....  ickusslime@... | 07/14/04
Spoken like a true thief. (Pirate for the faint of heart.)  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Again with the lies and deceptive language  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Without his hazy lies, Bittie's WHOLE world would fall apart!  Jeff Spicoli | 07/14/04
Sorry, still NWOR.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
No way of replying?  Martin Marvinski | 07/14/04
Not to worry, the scum knows what it means.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
I thought you were above name calling  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Name calling? No, name application.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Okay, but remember this...  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Thank you father tic. Buwahahaha  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
I said "faint of heart" just for you tic.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
You are a manipulative liar  tic swayback | 07/14/04
And your momma wears combat boots.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
A fact, not an insult  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Since when is that an insult?  TechDiva_z | 07/14/04
TechDiva, go to your bosses office immediately.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Ah tic my laddy, your gong over the ledge.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
No Ax is an arsonist  tic swayback | 07/14/04
No_ax try Criminal  voska | 07/14/04
Yup, completely over the edge.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Sounds right, maybe I will.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Are the RIAA theives?  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Its nice that you make up such swell stuff.  ickusslime@... | 07/14/04
Heard it all before and,,, nothing has changed.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
You must live in a fairy world...  ickusslime@... | 07/14/04
Hmmm, what was MS's profits last year?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
You completely miss the point  ickusslime@... | 07/14/04
Hmmm, ok, remind me in 100 years then.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
I disagree  voska | 07/14/04
Talk about a one-trick pony...  TechDiva_z | 07/14/04
Oh my Gawd, Harry Potter ends all Freedom in USA.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
It just might...  TechDiva_z | 07/14/04
exactly!!!  ickusslime@... | 07/14/04
Their choice and your choice.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
yay!!!  ickusslime@... | 07/14/04
No clue as to how retail works, I see  TechDiva_z | 07/14/04
Sorry TechDiva, you are wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Profits  voska | 07/14/04
No, speed limits are for the worst of drivers.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
No really, consumers have little to say.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
But speed limits are for you  voska | 07/14/04
Speed limits  voska | 07/15/04
By the way, did you ask your boss about "the benjamins" yet?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Well did you ask yet???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Sorry for keeping you in suspense  TechDiva_z | 07/14/04
Come on, inquiring minds want to know.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
It's more like "the Georges"  TechDiva_z | 07/14/04
Ah, so you suck the public hind teat.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
You really have no clue, do you?  TechDiva_z | 07/14/04
No, I did my time with Uncle Sam, then I grew up.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
So it's YOUR fault!  TechDiva_z | 07/14/04
Exactly how does one get fired from the DOD after only 8 months?  B.O.F.H. | 07/14/04
sneak up? Already here  voska | 07/14/04
See tic, just for you.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Not enough information in this article  Michael Kelly | 07/14/04
Cripes, they just formed the group.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
I'm not criticizing at all  Michael Kelly | 07/14/04
I see some potential here, but...  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Haven't you been following along?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
But they could offer that without DRM  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Maybe in your small world...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
A tiny drop in the bucket  tic swayback | 07/14/04
HDTV are too expensive  voska | 07/14/04
Yup, lots of fools said the same about "color tv".  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
yeah but it took time  voska | 07/14/04
How much do those things cost?  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Actually Bit, we haven't been waiting for anything  Jeff Spicoli | 07/14/04
NWOR  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Oooo, Can I guess????  middle of nowhere | 07/15/04
Forced updates  voiceofreason_z | 07/14/04
I see this happening too  Jeff Spicoli | 07/14/04
"allow movie studios to specify exactly what could be done with the video"  BitTwiddler | 07/14/04
Correct, OWNERS decide what to do with their property.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
And that's where they'll blow it  tic swayback | 07/14/04
And that too is their CHOICE.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Mostly agree here  tic swayback | 07/14/04
I agree there  voska | 07/14/04
Right, and MY choice is  middle of nowhere | 07/15/04
But not what you do with your property  voska | 07/14/04
You got one right...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
All owners = cartel  seosamh_z | 07/14/04
Cartell? Who is stopping you from making a movie?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
I'd like to do that one day  voska | 07/14/04
And i would support your efforts 100%  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
missed the point  seosamh_z | 07/14/04
Cannes is part of the cartel  TechDiva_z | 07/14/04
You said the MAGIC word!!!  TechDiva_z | 07/14/04
Won't work  prong@... | 07/14/04
Couldn't agree more  seosamh_z | 07/14/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement