On CBS.com: Six show girls attacked
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By John Borland
Posted on ZDNet News: Aug 4, 2004 5:10:00 AM

DVD-copying software maker 321 Studios has closed its doors, driven out of business by a succession of court decisions that said its most popular product was illegal to distribute.

In a posting on its Web site, the company said it could no longer sell or support any of its products.

"Despite 321 Studios' best efforts to remain in business, injunctions entered against 321 Studios by three U.S. federal courts earlier this year has resulted in 321 Studios no longer being able to continue operating," the site now reads.

The St. Louis-based company had cast itself as a test case of controversial provisions in copyright law that make it illegal to distribute software that breaks through digital copy protections.

Executives said that the company's popular DVD X Copy, which allowed people to make copies of DVDs, was simply a tool that allowed people to exercise their rights to make backups of legally purchased movies.

However, most commercial DVDs come wrapped in a copy-protection mechanism that prevents that kind of backup. Several courts subsequently ruled that even if consumers might have a theoretical right to make their own personal copies, 321 Studios could not sell tools that would help them break through that copy protection.

After deliberations that lasted nearly eight months, a San Francisco federal judge in February issued a preliminary injunction against sale of the software. Several parallel judgments quickly followed, and by mid-June the company said it was close to shutting down.

On its Web site, the company says some versions of its legal products are still available in stores. It offers an online form for people to check the status of outstanding rebates.

While no longer available in stores, the company's software, along with other DVD copying tools, are still being widely distributed through peer-to-peer networks and elsewhere online.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 160 Talkback(s)
Oh forgot to say
Welcome to Bleem 2004. If the company or organization has enough cash, they can use the court system to bankrupt competitors or 3rd party providers without addressing the consumers needs and desires.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: FilledOut Posted on: 08/07/04 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
I've got my copy Martin Marvinski   | 08/03/04
Well said! bchesmer   | 08/04/04
So its abandonware? Nigel Johnstone   | 08/04/04
Already available on Internet? wshwe   | 08/04/04
Can't see it Nigel Johnstone   | 08/04/04
The Constitution? Check again. alterego_z   | 08/04/04
And who would stop me? Nigel Johnstone   | 08/04/04
It was used for stealing bad Hollywood Movies cybershoplifter   | 08/04/04
DraXken DraXken   | 08/04/04
DraXken DraXken   | 08/04/04
works for me r7di697   | 08/04/04
Great! r7di697   | 08/04/04
I'll have to agree.... DarbyOhara   | 08/04/04
So you're saying.. d_jedi   | 08/04/04
Not necessarily.. Patrick Jones   | 08/04/04
Really? d_jedi   | 08/04/04
Actually TechDiva_z   | 08/04/04
It's a shame... BitTwiddler   | 08/04/04
Only a fool would attempt to build a Biz on illegal software... realitycheck101   | 08/04/04
Illegal? WhoIsDaMan   | 08/04/04
Wasting your time.... DarbyOhara   | 08/04/04
George, I will NEVER undestand that view point. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
True... Patrick Jones   | 08/04/04
DMCA stops more than you think Letophoro   | 08/04/04
What does that have to do with "innovation". No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
MP3 PLAYER/VCR/Player Piano/Printing Press cybershoplifter   | 08/04/04
Huh, these are all copies, not innovation. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
Re: NoAx d_jedi   | 08/04/04
Actually Letophoro   | 08/04/04
Ands still, all you show is "copying", not innovation. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
bittie takes a pounding! cybershoplifter   | 08/04/04
Good example of innovation voska   | 08/04/04
Sorry, you are 100% dead wrong. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
That's what innovation is voska   | 08/04/04
yup those fools... rafe01   | 08/04/04
I've been PC-ed rafe01   | 08/04/04
Please explain, then.. d_jedi   | 08/04/04
MP3 PLAYER cybershoplifter   | 08/04/04
Not illegal according to our own laws TechDiva_z   | 08/04/04
one technicality... ryusen   | 08/04/04
321 Studios Not SUPPORTING DVD-Xcopy BillP_z   | 08/04/04
are U saying it doesn't work? cybershoplifter   | 08/04/04
Next, the want to outlaw your VCR alterego_z   | 08/04/04
Won't happen or work... DarbyOhara   | 08/04/04
The problem is.. d_jedi   | 08/04/04
What's legal vs. what's right Tux Groomer   | 08/04/04
Right vs. responsibility No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
Apples and Oranges... Patrick Jones   | 08/04/04
Ah, because it's "cheap" is your only answer. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
How? Patrick Jones   | 08/04/04
Let's take your concept a bit futher. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
It would change the market is all voska   | 08/04/04
No it would change the laws and make it illegal. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
Nice try.. Patrick Jones   | 08/04/04
Patrick, utopia has never existed. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
Utopia Patrick Jones   | 08/04/04
Dinosaur voska   | 08/04/04
Replication TechDiva_z   | 08/04/04
Your example makes no sense! cybershoplifter   | 08/04/04
Cyber, I will NEVER make sense to you or your ilk. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
no, but eLurker   | 08/04/04
You can fix the car... bchesmer   | 08/04/04
that's a stupid argument.... ryusen   | 08/04/04
Nice try but... mcunningham   | 08/04/04
Not really.. Patrick Jones   | 08/04/04
Re: What's legal vs what's right alterego_z   | 08/04/04
Don't think there are not a lot of us!! cybershoplifter   | 08/04/04
Spacebarnowillegal Mack DaNife   | 08/04/04
Try again! Mack DaNife   | 08/04/04
They gave the software away in the end... No_Ax_to_Grind-   | 08/04/04
Won't people make copies and sell them at the flea market? cybershoplifter   | 08/04/04
Key word-"sell" TechDiva_z   | 08/04/04
Sigh, another loser that wants to be me. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
THIS IS WHY u GET DELETED! cybershoplifter   | 08/04/04
Hasn't happened yet. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
Who needs 321, just use DVD Decrypter BostonITGuy   | 08/04/04
it was very very easy to use? cybershoplifter   | 08/04/04
DVD DECRYPT/DVD SHRINK itanalyst   | 08/04/04
Up Yours Hollyweird!!!!! wadeprater   | 08/04/04
Guess What, Dude? Stewart Cannon   | 08/04/04
Re-read his post Patrick Jones   | 08/04/04
Um, where does this supposed "right" come from? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
so eLurker   | 08/04/04
Um, how does that answer my question? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
um, only if you answer mine first eLurker   | 08/04/04
Nope wrong... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
where did i say that? eLurker   | 08/04/04
im still waiting eLurker   | 08/04/04
Either way... bchesmer   | 08/04/04
Not according to three courts. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
Incorrect... bchesmer   | 08/04/04
Here you go Letophoro   | 08/04/04
Read it, I see nothing to back up what your saying. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
OK Letophoro   | 08/04/04
HUH??? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
Selective reading, read it again. voska   | 08/04/04
My VCR made excellent copies Patrick Jones   | 08/04/04
Yeah, if you think MPEG1 is "excellent". No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
and ill ask again for him eLurker   | 08/04/04
Hey AX read this ;-) bchesmer   | 08/04/04
Where does it say you can't? voska   | 08/04/04
Don't be so hostile, I am asking a serious question. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
I don't see why it makes a differnce voska   | 08/04/04
It makes a differnece to the copyright owners obviously. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
copyright owners eLurker   | 08/04/04
All Content is digital on the internet voska   | 08/04/04
voska, yup, and they don't sell movies over the net because of it. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
Clarification for Voska TechDiva_z   | 08/04/04
no_axe, ah, nope eLurker   | 08/04/04
Right here, Don-it specifically says "digital" TechDiva_z   | 08/04/04
Thanks Diva, I appreciate it. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
Eat your BBQ! bchesmer   | 08/04/04
Re: Eat your BBQ! wadeprater   | 08/04/04
Not the issue here TechDiva_z   | 08/04/04
It's called "capitalism" WhoIsDaMan   | 08/04/04
ALl theses types of programs... Stewart Cannon   | 08/04/04
Even 321 knows it. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
Seems the judge could see it. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
But, they may be blind, read this article bchesmer   | 08/04/04
Disclaimer WhoIsDaMan   | 08/04/04
That's not the issue! bchesmer   | 08/04/04
Thank you for bringing up copy machines!!! No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
They still work TechDiva_z   | 08/04/04
you CAN copy money buxxmaster   | 08/04/04
Slight flaw in you logic voska   | 08/04/04
Again, I see your mistake. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
and you have proof? ryusen   | 08/04/04
Ok, how about... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
it doesnt work for me eLurker   | 08/04/04
Doens't matter if you think they were right. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
we all know eLurker   | 08/04/04
Nope, Those were DMCA cases voska   | 08/04/04
True enough, but what's the end result? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
But not the right result TechDiva_z   | 08/04/04
re: Ok, how about... ryusen   | 08/04/04
Tell me what proof you want then. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
Show em! bchesmer   | 08/04/04
ok... ryusen   | 08/04/04
why on earth eLurker   | 08/04/04
DMCA tramples Fair Use JimmyJames   | 08/04/04
I see your mistake... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
That doesn't always work TechDiva_z   | 08/04/04
open source it... ryusen   | 08/04/04
XEROX SUES 60 YEAR OLD MAN FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT itanalyst   | 08/04/04
Now this post will surly win over Congress... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
do you think eLurker   | 08/04/04
No_Ax_to_Grind wadeprater   | 08/04/04
Gee, so in your point of view an honest person is the enemy. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
or eLurker   | 08/04/04
Gee, who do they seem to be listening to now? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
ahem eLurker   | 08/04/04
ITS CALLED SATIRE MORONS!!! itanalyst   | 08/05/04
Here's some good News on digital copying bchesmer   | 08/04/04
Thinking out loud, there is an easy answer. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/04/04
Ax... bchesmer   | 08/04/04
just like if they had bought Napster buxxmaster   | 08/04/04
not a bad idea but... ryusen   | 08/04/04
congratulations eLurker   | 08/04/04
So its way past time to get courts to rule on consumer's rights FilledOut   | 08/05/04
Oh forgot to say FilledOut   | 08/07/04

What do you think?