On The Insider: Alyssa Milano Engaged to Non-Athlete
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Matt Loney
Posted on ZDNet News: Jan 14, 2004 1:59:00 PM

Companies outside the United States that use Linux now face the threat of legal action from the SCO Group, following the announcement Wednesday that SCO's licenses are available worldwide.

SCO's Linux licensing program has proved controversial in the United States since launching last year, after the company claimed Linux extensively infringed its Unix System V intellectual property. SCO, in its previous incarnation as Caldera Systems, had acquired some rights to Unix when it bought the operating-systems division from the original Santa Cruz-based SCO. Caldera Systems renamed itself SCO after the takeover, while the remains of the original SCO became Tarantella.

Many open-source and free-software advocates have contested SCO’s claims, while the company has pressed ahead with threats of legal action against American companies that use Linux. Several Linux vendors have offered their customers indemnity against legal action from SCO.


Get Up to Speed on...
Open source
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.


Nevertheless, SCO describes its intellectual property license for Linux as a run-time license that "permits the use of SCO’s intellectual property, in binary form only, as contained in Linux distributions." By purchasing an SCO IP license, the software vendor says, companies "avoid infringement of SCO's intellectual property and copyrights as…is currently found in Linux."

Announcing availability of the licenses worldwide, Chris Sontag, senior vice president and general manager of SCOsource, which is the company's intellectual property licensing arm, conceded that the offer is a double-edged sword.

Companies outside the United States that use Linux could already buy a license from SCOsource under the existing license program running within the United States. But the explicit offer of licenses worldwide brings with it the implicit threat of legal action for those who do not comply.

The first lawsuits are now only weeks away, according to Sontag. "I would expect within the next few weeks we will have a number of Linux end users who we will have identified and taken legal action (against)," Sontag told ZDNet UK. "We will probably see that ramping up over time."

The lawsuits will be brought in various locations around the world, Sontag said. "We are going to start vigorously enforcing IP rights."

Sontag said there is a possibility that the first round of lawsuits could include U.K. companies, but it was likely to focus on companies maintaining large Linux deployments with whom SCOsource has already had "unsuccessful" discussions. These are likely to be high-profile companies, according to sources.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 128 Talkback(s)
Hmmm
Indeed..... (Read the rest)
Posted by: cmalpeli Posted on: 01/21/04 You are currently: Logged In as: a Guest  | Login | Terms of Use
Hmmm....  BitTwiddler | 01/14/04
hmm hmm  NemesisNL | 01/14/04
Wow...  Martin Marvinski | 01/14/04
Yeah! whatever....  DarbyOhara | 01/14/04
This will be fun  NemesisNL | 01/14/04
U.S. Courts run Linux  IT_User | 01/14/04
LOL  NemesisNL | 01/14/04
Which court?  Chad_z | 01/14/04
Yea, why dont they.  jpfitz@... | 01/15/04
i thought  ryusen | 01/14/04
libelous claims on their website  NemesisNL | 01/14/04
my guess is  ryusen | 01/15/04
This could be entertaining  MarcB_z | 01/14/04
Bring it on  Fred Fredrickson | 01/14/04
Agree, let's do it!  dg mh | 01/14/04
If SCO were right...  sinkme | 01/14/04
are you serous?  ryusen | 01/14/04
You have to admit...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
they have large brass ones  mgalle | 01/14/04
Nahhh  NemesisNL | 01/14/04
They are just making money  voska | 01/14/04
Not from licensing, they're not!  dicktaurus@... | 01/14/04
Sure it's From Licensing  voska | 01/14/04
stock manipulation...  ryusen | 01/14/04
They (SCO) tried this in Germany and failed  B.O.F.H. | 01/14/04
SCO are Patsies for Microsoft FUD Scare  MacGeek2121 | 01/19/04
Fighting the good fight  Mike Cox | 01/14/04
You go, Mike!  IT_Firefighter | 01/14/04
I don't think it's satire  John E Wahd | 01/14/04
It's satire.  Steve Summers | 01/14/04
Sounds like a rock band  Chad_z | 01/14/04
Mike Cox's post is offensive! he is violating my IP by posting it.  critek1@... | 01/14/04
what fud?  ryusen | 01/14/04
Fighting the good fight  speed140 | 01/14/04
LOL, that's a good one haha  ThereThere | 01/15/04
Confusing  John CarrollZDNet Moderator | 01/14/04
Confusing  orlando@... | 01/14/04
Sorry, you are wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
That is just IBM..  Patrick Jones | 01/14/04
True, but...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
Third Party  Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04
Huh?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
No they do not  NemesisNL | 01/14/04
I've seen no court ruling to support that claim.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
burdon of proof  ryusen | 01/14/04
Burden of proof is half right.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
eh?  ryusen | 01/14/04
It's not that easy John.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
re: It's not that easy John.  Iain_Peters | 01/14/04
Champion stinker  Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04
Now that is funny!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
What SCO and Novell are debating is System 5  B.O.F.H. | 01/14/04
re: Confusing  Iain_Peters | 01/14/04
The might not like our courts  NemesisNL | 01/14/04
Unless SCO is right.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
Maybe  Patrick Jones | 01/14/04
Again, its NOT the code.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
Isn't that what the Linux billing is about?  doctormoriarty | 01/14/04
That's where it gets very murky.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
IBM suit is not about code  sinkme | 01/14/04
You are arguing 2 different things...  Patrick Jones | 01/14/04
Sort of, maybe, and who knows...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
So the users have no concern  Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04
Unless the courts rule...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
What IP?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04
But technically it is the code  voska | 01/14/04
"Methods and Concepts"  Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04
NO, the code has little if anything to do with it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
Yagotta, its called a contract.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
Yes, it's a contract  Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04
Let me clear the IBM thing up  slopoke | 01/14/04
Slowpoke, sorry but you are wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
That's still code  voska | 01/14/04
Voska, no it's not code.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
it is in the code  rgriffith64@... | 01/14/04
Right about what?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04
Have you a cite?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
Dec. 5th hearing  dscherf | 01/14/04
Thanks, I'll look it over.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
Possibility? Balderdash.  John Le'Brecage | 01/14/04
Sorry, you are wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
"...always a possibility." ? Yeah, right, between ZERO & NIL.  dicktaurus@... | 01/14/04
Even *IF* SCO is right...  Robert Crocker | 01/14/04
exactly  JWatson77 | 01/15/04
more likely  ryusen | 01/14/04
Possibility  NoB$ | 01/14/04
Forced you into the gutter again I see.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
don't you think...  ryusen | 01/15/04
Unless SCO is right  NemesisNL | 01/14/04
Confusing? Not really.  Eggs Ackley_z | 01/14/04
Confusing, maybe, but a good strategy  JJ_z | 01/14/04
No, JJ  Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04
So I'm a fence  NemesisNL | 01/14/04
Confusing, maybe, but a good strategy  JJ_z | 01/14/04
It's all very clear  Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04
It's so clear it's costing millions.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
Exactly!!!!!  NemesisNL | 01/14/04
Even slam-dunk defenses cost money, Don  Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04
Point being, it's not "clear" or simple.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
Quirk!  Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04
Poor bitty. Does not get it.  NoB$ | 01/14/04
Somebody please  Netizen Kane | 01/14/04
Message has been deleted.  RobertoSalazar | 01/14/04
FUD  Unicornrider | 01/14/04
Yup  Martin Marvinski | 01/14/04
re: FUD  Iain_Peters | 01/14/04
work for IBM  NemesisNL | 01/14/04
Move to Taiwan  doctormoriarty | 01/14/04
Nobody has ever won attacking own base  MartinT_z | 01/14/04
Re: Nobody has ever won attacking own base  jimmied43 | 01/15/04
Going global might put SCO execs in physical danger  jjon2121 | 01/14/04
Stock pump  NT Admin | 01/14/04
That's odd...  fullebr@... | 01/14/04
What IP?  rgriffith64@... | 01/14/04
Clueless bitty, as usual.  NoB$ | 01/14/04
Sorry full of B$  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
Bitty's argument shown flawed, takes authoritarian attitude.  NoB$ | 01/14/04
nice words...  ryusen | 01/14/04
2-Bit?! Not trying to convince anyone? But you're a paid Micro$hill!  dicktaurus@... | 01/14/04
SCO CEOs arrested for extortion.  speed140 | 01/14/04
I am tired of - SCO: put up or shut up !  Chris.Papoudaris@... | 01/15/04
OK SCO, come on...  Frodo42 | 01/15/04
Can't deliver  uheg | 01/15/04
KISS  wbs00001 | 01/15/04
sco can't sell a linux license  JWatson77 | 01/15/04
What would be an appropriate reply to SCO's insanity...  Motu | 01/15/04
Cool  cmalpeli | 01/21/04
Hmmm  cmalpeli | 01/21/04

What do you think?

CIO Sessions

advertisement
Click Here