On TV.com: THE GIRLS NEXT DOOR photos
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Stephen Shankland
Posted on ZDNet News: Jan 20, 2004 7:50:00 AM

In response to SCO Group's legal action against Linux, Red Hat is offering new legal protection that guarantees the company will replace any code found to infringe copyrights.

The warranty, part of a new project called the Open Source Assurance Program, is for all existing and future customers of the Raleigh, N.C.-based company's Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system products, the company said in an announcement Monday night, shortly before the LinuxWorld Conference and Expo that begins Wednesday in New York.

SCO alleges that IBM improperly moved Unix intellectual property into Linux and, independently, that Linux infringes on the company's Unix copyrights. But offers of legal defense are sprouting all over the Linux landscape as advocates try to defuse threats from SCO, which has sued IBM for breach of contract and has promised to sue a Linux user for copyright infringement.


Get Up to Speed on...
Open source
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.


Novell, the No. 2 Linux seller after Red Hat by virtue of its acquisition of SuSE Linux, began indemnifying its Linux customers last week, following in the footsteps of Hewlett-Packard.

The Open Source Development Labs, a multi-company Linux consortium, began a a $10 million legal defense fund last week. And Montavista Software, which sells Linux for "embedded" computing devices such as consumer electronics or telecommunications gear, like Red Hat has a warrantee program.

And at the last LinuxWorld show, in August, Red Hat began a legal defense fund to protect open-source programmers.

"It seems to me, particularly with the indemnity funds, it's less and less of an issue every day," said C.E. Unterberg Towbin securities analyst Katherine Egbert of the SCO attack.

Open-source software such as Linux is developed by a multitude of programmers, many not working for the company selling a product such as a version of Linux or a server that includes the operating system. That collaborative programming method, while leading programmers from competing companies to cooperate, makes it harder for a single company to control what's in a specific software package.

Open-source software can result in complicated copyright issues. In some cases, such as MySQL's database, the company owns all the copyrights to the software. In the Linux kernel at the heart of the operating system, however, each programmer owns the copyright for whatever patch of code he or she wrote unless the copyright was assigned to another person or entity.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 44 Talkback(s)
MuffinMan = Bill Gates (or a dwarf clone of him)
If it were so clearcut as you make out, dunderhead, I guess the case would have been long resolved by now. But, strangely, SCO keeps coming up appallingly short in the evidence department.

Do us all a favor, and hold your breath until Darlin McBride and his cadre of liars are victorious.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: cyberian_z Posted on: 01/25/04 You are currently: Logged In as: a Guest  | Login | Terms of Use
looking up for SCO  cvos | 01/20/04
The only people who will see any of that money...  rbethell | 01/20/04
Why would anyone deal with this?  Mike Cox | 01/20/04
ROTFLMAO  Patrick Jones | 01/20/04
I doff the fedora to you Master Cox  Squawkbox | 01/20/04
Brilliant  NemesisNL | 01/20/04
Man, that was a perfect riff. Author! Author!  dicktaurus@... | 01/20/04
Errors in the last paragraphs  mlybbert | 01/20/04
How big of them!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/20/04
"Replace" != "Remove"  dscherf | 01/20/04
Well, um,, DUH!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/20/04
It apparently wasn't obvious to you  dscherf | 01/20/04
Obvious to anyone with a brain.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/20/04
Not legally required  dscherf | 01/20/04
Let me use little words for you.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/20/04
IP != Physical Property  dscherf | 01/20/04
No  NemesisNL | 01/20/04
one born every minute...  Chris Moller | 01/20/04
What a cute little rant.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/20/04
What a cute little rant.  Loverock Davidson | 01/20/04
glass house * (stones + throwing) == lots of broken glass (nt)  ryusen | 01/20/04
Ranting vs. needling.  Chris Moller | 01/20/04
Hard to tell with all the noise.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/20/04
So stop posting yours  NemesisNL | 01/20/04
Okay, Brilliant, what would you do?  IT_User | 01/20/04
I would ignore it rather than look stupid.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/20/04
Copyright = null  IT_User | 01/20/04
Exactly  NemesisNL | 01/20/04
SCO has no problem hiding UC Berkeley (BSD) Copyright notices  B.O.F.H. | 01/20/04
SCO Donations  MuffinMan_z | 01/20/04
Copyrighted code not in dispute  dscherf | 01/20/04
If this is a contract case ...  George Jay | 01/20/04
THe suit is about "methods and concepts".  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/20/04
That seems to be the latest take...  IT_User | 01/20/04
No it's not  NemesisNL | 01/20/04
I believe you are correct, although...  IT_User | 01/20/04
PR versus statements to the Court  dscherf | 01/20/04
to late to be reluctant  NemesisNL | 01/20/04
HAHAHAHAHAH  poogranite | 01/20/04
I want whatever you're putting in your muffins! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA  dicktaurus@... | 01/20/04
MuffinMan = Bill Gates (or a dwarf clone of him)  cyberian_z | 01/25/04
Private Conversation between Stallman and Torvalds  MuffinMan_z | 01/20/04
sco code  JWatson77 | 01/20/04
Real Issue of IBM VS SCO  john public | 01/21/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

Storage Virtualization

  • In virtual environments, storage matters. It influences everything from application availability and disaster readiness to power consumption and TCO. Bottom line: Don’t defeat the purpose of your consolidation by skimping on storage.
  • From our sponsors
  • EMC Corporation
  • ESG applauds new CX4 in analyst report According to ESG, it's hard to find much missing in the new CLARiiON CX4. Read the report to learn more »
advertisement
Click Here