On UrbanBaby: I won't vaccinate my daughter!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Matt Loney
Posted on ZDNet News: Jan 29, 2004 5:39:00 PM

Online bank Egg is considering a move away from pure Web interfaces for its customers, in a shift that will have implications for developers as well as customers.

If Egg, which made its name as a pure online bank with no physical branches, takes this route, those among its 3 million customers who want to make the most of the bank's features would have to run the Windows operating system.

"Today, Egg is primarily Web-based," said Chief Information Officer Tom Llube, addressing the Developing Software for the Future Microsoft Platform conference at London's QEII Conference Centre this week. "But going forward, we will have to move it to smart-client-based solution."

The smart client--in this case, an operating system that incorporates browser functions--is likely to involve Longhorn, Microsoft's next version of the Windows operating system, said Llube, who provided a demonstration for the audience at the conference.

Longhorn, which isn't expected to debut until 2006, will include many technological enhancements, including a new data storage and retrieval system and better graphics than current versions of Windows. Microsoft has also hinted that Longhorn's debut will coincide with a move to end the distribution of stand-alone Web browser software.

The move from the browser-based model to a smart-client model will be an important shift for Egg, Llube said. "Longhorn is a key bit of the jigsaw that enables me to take that step. Our view is that any company serious about this type of thing needs to look at smart-client, customer-side computing."


Special report
Cracking the nest egg
Consumers are finally starting to bank
online in substantial numbers--and the
hackers aren't far behind them.


Later, in a question-and-answer session with journalists, Llube denied that the change would force all customers to move to Longhorn. Those using other operating systems such as Linux or the Mac OS would still be able to use the services through a Web client as all Egg customers currently do, said Llube, but those who wanted to videoconference live with the bank's support desk, for instance, would need to run Microsoft's upcoming operating system.

But, he said, the bank will move away from the current "one size fits all" model to having a range of services suited to different types of users. "So, if I have a critical mass of users on Longhorn who expect a different class of experience, we will cater for them, but we would support the others."

Llube also said the changing philosophy will affect the way developers will have to think. "My developers are going to have think much more about what it means to a customer--how it looks to them--than they do at the moment," he said. "I am becoming more discriminating about the type of developer I think I need, if I'm to develop these types of application. It is because technology is so fundamental to us. It runs through everything we do."

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 64 Talkback(s)
re : caller id
"

ms callerid

would only work with a ms-phone, ms-ansering machine, ms-this, ms-that

LOL - yeah, the caller id anology works for me "


and bit will be right there to say, consumers are free to choose - choose to use it or not to use it - LOL... (Read the rest)
Posted by: JWatson77 Posted on: 01/30/04 You are currently: Logged In as: a Guest  | Login | Terms of Use
Good move!  dr praetorius | 01/29/04
Talk about a great way to go out of business!  Bobby Sskcat | 01/29/04
This should be in Java, think cost, security, and cross platform.  DonnieBoy | 01/29/04
he, he, he...  dg mh | 01/29/04
You Are Correct ...  coffeenite | 01/29/04
Not a Very Smart Egg ...  coffeenite | 01/29/04
Hmm, vaporware? How is it that I'm running it?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
Great idea  zd-spam | 01/29/04
Well, you also think lying in a court of law...  Bobby Sskcat | 01/29/04
Oh?  rpmyers1 | 01/29/04
You mean like Linux betas?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
Public download  rpmyers1 | 01/29/04
Sure can.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
Whinger  rkhalloran | 01/29/04
What are you talking about?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
Bitty bragging about brochureware...boring  zd-spam | 01/29/04
noax, you're almost right  km4hr@... | 01/29/04
Uh huh, just keep watching.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
Java???  Doug@... | 01/29/04
Machine?  IT_User | 01/29/04
no kidding  JWatson77 | 01/30/04
Just the begining folks.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
So you would ...  dr praetorius | 01/29/04
Good Grief! Read the article!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
Nope  dr praetorius | 01/29/04
Huh?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
Name a service  rpmyers1 | 01/29/04
Java? The only jave I want to see is coffee.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
gee - leave it to no-axe  JWatson77 | 01/30/04
Would you feel the same  dr praetorius | 01/29/04
Um, there are.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
RE: Caller ID  JakAttak | 01/29/04
Exactly right!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
ms callerid  JWatson77 | 01/30/04
re : caller id  JWatson77 | 01/30/04
But what if there's no big uptake for Longhorn???  Bobby Sskcat | 01/29/04
A false argument to be sure.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
Linux marketshare CANNOT be guaged!  Bobby Sskcat | 01/29/04
Not according to Netcraft...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
Current marketshare?  IT_User | 01/29/04
Wow, a return to client-server architectures  B.O.F.H. | 01/29/04
Not gonna happen  IT_User | 01/29/04
Clue about what?  Chad_z | 01/29/04
Ok, so we're going backwards again, eh?  jwhanon | 01/29/04
There is no "browser".  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
What do you mean?  FirstNLastN | 01/29/04
Go slow..Bittie will believe any tripe M$ spoon feeds to him  Bobby Sskcat | 01/29/04
Tell you what little one.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
results - hahahahahahaha  JWatson77 | 01/30/04
You lost me...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
Side benefit  zd-spam | 01/29/04
It's easy to know when you've won a debate.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
No_Ax, you have resorted to the name calling gutter many times!  B.O.F.H. | 01/29/04
So you want a return to client-server?  B.O.F.H. | 01/29/04
i would not  JWatson77 | 01/30/04
Maybe it's market bifurcation  IT_User | 01/29/04
bravo ...browser bad  nograin | 01/29/04
however...  nograin | 01/29/04
Client/Server?  dlu | 01/29/04
It is a story of an old company doing old tricks  serpentmage | 01/29/04
X-windows, An entirely new MS Concept  km4hr@... | 01/29/04
Ironically, this IS a good thing ...  George Mitchell | 01/29/04
Why wait? You can do it today using FLASH  Debunker | 01/30/04
the only reason  JWatson77 | 01/30/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

CIO Sessions

advertisement
Click Here