On TechRepublic: 10 Firefox add-ons you gotta have
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Stephen Shankland
Posted on ZDNet News: Mar 19, 2004 9:31:00 PM

The SCO Group, the company that's hoping to profit from its assertion that Linux violates its Unix intellectual property, has threatened legal action against two federal supercomputer users, letters released Thursday show.

SCO sent letters raising the prospect of legal action for using Linux to two Department of Energy facilities, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC).


Get Up to Speed on...
Open source
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.


The letter to NERSC director Horst Simon used strong language in its effort to convince the research facility to buy a license that will let it use Linux without fear of SCO legal action.

"I am requesting a meeting so that we may discuss the alternatives available to your firm. WE BELIEVE WE CAN PROPOSE SOLUTIONS THAT WILL BE AGREEABLE AND ECONOMICALLY FEASIBLE FOR YOU," Gregory Pettit, SCO's regional director of intellectual-property licensing, wrote in the Jan. 16 letter, which he said was a follow-up to a Dec. 19 notification.

"If you fail to respond to our efforts to pursue a licensing arrangement, WE WILL TURN YOUR NAME OVER TO OUR OUTSIDE COUNSEL FOR CONSIDERATION OF LEGAL ACTION," Pettit said.

It's not an idle threat, though many Linux fans dismiss the Lindon, Utah-based company's assertions. SCO's attorneys, Boies Schiller & Flexner, have indeed sued AutoZone for its use of Linux, claiming that the open-source operating system infringes on SCO's Unix copyrights. That point is disputed, though: Novell, an earlier Unix owner, argues that it still owns the copyrights, the subject of another lawsuit.

The letter to the Livermore lab was one of many that SCO sent in December. The letter argues that dozens of files in Linux use application binary interfaces, taken from Unix, in violation of U.S. copyright law.

Mark Koehn, an intellectual-property attorney at Shaw-Pittman, received the letters from the government in response to a Freedom of Information Act request. Koehn's firm represents some companies that have received letters from SCO, he said.

NERSC spokesman Jon Bashor said of the letter, "This matter has been referred to legal staff, and we are unable to comment on it at this time." Livermore didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.

Linux is widely used for supercomputers made of clusters of lower-end machines, and the Energy Department is an avid consumer of such machines to support work such as ensuring nuclear weapons' reliability and forecasting global climate changes.

Both Energy Department facilities are extensive Linux users.

Livermore already announced a 962-machine Linux computer, and its 1,152-computer Multiprogrammatic Capability Cluster ranks seventh on the November 2003 ranking of the world's 500 fastest supercomputers.

Livermore also will be the site that houses IBM's Linux-based Blue Gene/L, a machine that's expected to be the world's fastest.

NERSC has a 412-computer Linux cluster called the Parallel Distributed Systems Facility. NERSC has cooperated for years on supercomputers with IBM--SCO's first target--including both Unix and Linux machines. A Unix system at NERSC is currently ranked the ninth-fastest supercomputer.

SCO's legal threats reinforce a message Chief Executive Darl McBride sent to another part of the federal government in January: members of Congress.

"Free or low-cost open-source software, full of proprietary code, is grabbing an increasing portion of the software market. Each open-source installation displaces or pre-empts a sale of proprietary, licensable and copyright-protected software," McBride said in a letter, republished by the Open Source and Industry Alliance. "This means fewer jobs, less software revenue and reduced incentives for software companies to innovate."

"We are firm in our belief that the unchecked spread of open-source software, under the GPL (the General Public License covers Linux and many other open-source programs), is a much more serious threat to our capitalist system than U.S. corporations realize," McBride said.

At the same time that SCO is attacking the U.S. government for its use of Linux supercomputers, it argues that those same types of machines can be used by military enemies.

"Open-source software--available widely through the Internet--has the potential to provide our nation's enemies or potential enemies with computing capabilities that are restricted by U.S. law," McBride said. "A computer expert in North Korea who has a number of personal computers can download the latest version of Linux...and in short order build a virtual supercomputer."

SCO sent the letter to every member of the Senate and House of Representatives, said Blake Stowell, a SCO spokesman.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 108 Talkback(s)
if it is TRUE then linux is toast - WRONG
Even if its true. A: It is unenforcable. B: The court can invalidate a patent or trademark if it is in the public intrest. C: It is irrelevant.

A: It is unenforcable because it is already in... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Cyrien Posted on: 03/23/04 You are currently: Logged In as: a Guest  | Login | Terms of Use
SCO id begging someone to put them out of their missery.(nt)  nite_w0lf | 03/19/04
They really need to be thrown in jail already  Teddy Tubesteak | 03/19/04
Place ALL disputed "Licensing" revenue in ESCROW!  kd5auq | 03/19/04
Why put YOUR money into escrow for unproven charges?  David Mohring | 03/19/04
It is CHEAPER to pay into excrow than to a lawyer.  kd5auq | 03/20/04
There is no disputed fee.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/20/04
If you think this thing isn't being disputed, you're delusional.  Bit's_Conscience | 03/20/04
Sorry, you are wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/20/04
You're full of it...  Jose Jimenez | 03/20/04
Maybe no dispute, but is illegal  fallison@... | 03/22/04
Simple math.  d_jedi | 03/21/04
But they have no case... yet.  bidemytime | 03/22/04
Irrelevant  Mack DaNife | 03/22/04
when SCO talks...  Arm A. Geddon | 03/19/04
no...  Arm A. Geddon | 03/19/04
oops...  Arm A. Geddon | 03/19/04
SCO  daremo_z | 03/19/04
False Claims Act:The SCO Group is commiting federal fraud  David Mohring | 03/19/04
Microsoft's plan  OhMyGosh | 03/19/04
A plea for relief from Microsoft's escalating anti-competitive tactics.  David Mohring | 03/19/04
Nicely written  Chad_z | 03/19/04
(NT) Spot On !00%  Bit's_Conscience | 03/19/04
Good Call  Teddy Tubesteak | 03/19/04
Spot on, Stan  Fred Fredrickson | 03/20/04
re: Spot on, Stan  cbradshaw@... | 03/22/04
You left out the little green men theory...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/20/04
Microsoft and threat to US and Capitalism  Cyrien | 03/22/04
M$  barrencross@... | 03/22/04
Ok who can explain this treachery  BryanS_z | 03/22/04
If "our" enemies are relying on MS or Linux...  Cyrien | 03/23/04
Hi, Stan. Quite Right.  John3_z | 03/22/04
not conclusive...  ryusen | 03/22/04
This makes an interesting national security issue  B.O.F.H. | 03/19/04
Why?  NemesisNL | 03/19/04
SCO will [probubly go after the NSA for Security Enhanced Linux (SEL)  B.O.F.H. | 03/19/04
lol  eLurker | 03/19/04
Better on Windows?  Mack DaNife | 03/22/04
Re: Better on Windows?  B.O.F.H. | 03/22/04
Open Source  barrencross@... | 03/22/04
Did Darl forget our "enemies" can DL any OS (bootleg copy) they want?!?  Stevo_z | 03/23/04
hmmmm  Stevo_z | 03/23/04
Anyone WithHalf Abrain  Cyrien | 03/23/04
Ah they could just put SCO out of business  voska | 03/19/04
Alot of people could  Suicida| | 03/20/04
Enough is Enough  Unicornrider | 03/19/04
SCO---Why?? Did the Prozac prescription run out???  drichards1953 | 03/22/04
Fear and loathing in Washington  Unicornrider | 03/19/04
"under US law" ???  TechDiva_z | 03/19/04
And still....  NemesisNL | 03/19/04
Dumb & Dumber  Chad_z | 03/19/04
(NT) They should pay SCO . . . with some of their nuclear waste !!!  Bit's_Conscience | 03/19/04
When Will Some Judge With B@lls Put An End To This Fiasco ???  Bit's_Conscience | 03/19/04
AMEN  scoobies_snacks | 03/21/04
War, anyone?  WhoIsDaMan | 03/19/04
You could always claim...  NemesisNL | 03/19/04
New symbol of MS Justice (former US Justice):  Vily Clay | 03/19/04
Huh?  Martin Marvinski | 03/19/04
... because it helps people to remember it better. (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/20/04
Don't try to make any sense of it Marv  Spoon Jabber | 03/22/04
Hubris  John L. Ries | 03/19/04
SCO has five bullets in that 6 shooter while playing Russian Roulette  Squawkbox | 03/19/04
Yes  Martin Marvinski | 03/19/04
Indeed  doctormoriarty | 03/22/04
What next, claims against Apple  FilledOut | 03/19/04
Dont put it past them  Suicida| | 03/20/04
Those are slated for later this year.  Rick_K | 03/20/04
I don't know about the Pope..but  Laff | 03/22/04
Claims against Apple......hmmmmm  drichards1953 | 03/22/04
Try BSD  Update victim | 03/22/04
What can we sue the Pope for?  Cyrien | 03/23/04
Does someone tell McBride this stuff?  Eggs Ackley_z | 03/19/04
Does someone tell McBride this stuff? Yes!  Rick_K | 03/20/04
I think McBride knows....  Laff | 03/22/04
Leave the politics out.  barrencross@... | 03/22/04
Everybody in politics lies..the only difference is  Laff | 03/22/04
Bambi Meets Godzilla  troutmaskreplica | 03/19/04
Re: Bambi Meets Godzilla  none none | 03/21/04
fear of terrorisim?  driv101 | 03/19/04
mine mine its all mine gimme gimme get to your room sco...  driv101 | 03/19/04
This story has the wrong title...  Hard Cider | 03/20/04
Just proves McBride is more evil than Bill Gates  DragonBRockin | 03/20/04
He is Bill Gate II  rickmci | 03/20/04
So you're saying, he's better than his master?  Rick_K | 03/20/04
Are you kidding?  gath | 03/20/04
or a pupet  JWatson77 | 03/22/04
(NT) He isn't more evil than Bill, just far more $tupid.  hal9000mx | 03/22/04
Stupider != More Evil  ryusen | 03/22/04
SCO=0wn3d  Suicida| | 03/20/04
Has McBride lost his mind?  rickmci | 03/20/04
Oh, I though SCO actually was Microsoft in disguise!  Mikael_z | 03/21/04
Darl is probably committing a crime  blahblahblah | 03/20/04
I think SCO is right (here comes the flame)  sammk@... | 03/21/04
Major Clarifications... No Flame.  doe_z | 03/21/04
SCO has no legal basis for action  drichards1953 | 03/22/04
legal credentials...  ryusen | 03/22/04
It's NOT the IBM suit that upsets people ... It's the extortion prior to...  Bit's_Conscience | 03/21/04
re: It's NOT the IBM suit  cbradshaw@... | 03/22/04
Sounds like bitty, again.  zd-spam | 03/22/04
a couple of points:  ryusen | 03/22/04
if it is TRUE then linux is toast - WRONG  Cyrien | 03/23/04
SCO - When You Can't Compete - Sue  ThinkingMan | 03/21/04
Be different if Windows boxes could be clustered ...  jellyclock | 03/22/04
Well, they CAN...  doctormoriarty | 03/22/04
SCO's suits are blackmail  jplantamura | 03/22/04
Wakeup Call  Update victim | 03/22/04
DuhDuhDuhDarl should read the commentary...  msdead | 03/22/04
Did Darl forget our 'enemies can DL any OS (bootleg copy) they want?!?  Stevo_z | 03/22/04
Send Darl To Christmas Island  RoyTyrellFl | 03/23/04

What do you think?

advertisement
Click Here